RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote:
If the "published table" had been well-established and had actually been extended since 2252 was published, then we wouldn't be talking about changing its nature. But it's the lack of clarity on what the table is in the first place that's the reason we're discussing it. Deciding that a table that in practice has never been extended is now by definition non-extensible is within scope, in my opinion.
-- Mark Smith Netscape Directory Product Development My words are my own, not my employer's.