[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.49) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.25)
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Subject: Re: RE24 testing call #2 (2.4.49) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.25)
- From: openldap-technical@kolttonen.fi
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:48:46 +0200 (EET)
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 vcust561.louhi.net 00SKmkha018481
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolttonen.fi; s=mail; t=1580244527; bh=fIoNhsiAkWbHIIsa0Pzf/7hT/hrBPXAEhqivEu5DRKQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nzdlOGoS1aXxRo276FEEr84Vydr0S2ogh87rfcD1y9E0lUww0k6jKQItkWbQAHuGs qv9sNZR0VYCEQCakjc1Un9pVevYVtmZ1JQtvoqHZTvEDQq8xOx+wwG0FWV/QBqeIIs OchEUJsUVa7nwEZPjwn9nX+x1+ZPYoqy8dGasW185bpHQu0YXPiS6sjeiF7bgXmiBm 3ntbafKjmA6wBukjGXnBRmHrQPTPaTNf6Njyf0p8M+h7s+LB2kz6Qv95Apr2vDgVt9 xZmZe2ri1B9005lWeqEKgRqVOkKdxnDf7OEY3T7xvL2GeGuM+DRkimKhbZATZMpoAm p02+LawEFTM0w==
- In-reply-to: <BAB5CA0BEB1C76DC4DD1E876@[192.168.1.144]>
- References: <BAB5CA0BEB1C76DC4DD1E876@[192.168.1.144]>
Hello,
On Tue, 28 Jan 2020, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Optionally, cd tests && make its to run through the regression suite.
The following happened on Fedora Linux 31:
>>>>> Starting its8521 ...
running defines.sh
This test tracks a case where a consumer fails to replicate from the
provider
when the provider is dynamically configured for replication.
See http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8521 and
See http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/?findid=8281 for more
information.
Starting provider slapd on TCP/IP port 9011...
Using ldapsearch to check that provider slapd is running...
Starting consumer slapd on TCP/IP port 9012...
Using ldapsearch to check that consumer slapd is running...
Setting serverID on provider...
Populating database on provider...
Configuring replication on the provider...
Configuring replication on the consumer...
Sleeping 10 seconds to allow replication to initiate...
Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the provider...
Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer...
ldapsearch should have failed with error 32. Got 0 instead!
This is a regression of ITS8281