[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: slapd: null_callback : error code 0x14
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Subject: Re: slapd: null_callback : error code 0x14
- From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 21:15:56 -0700
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Content-disposition: inline
- In-reply-to: <A490B24FC8DEE11A7275A5E5@[192.168.1.30]>
- References: <20170916024857.GJ4080@bender.it-sys.cpp.edu> <WM!5b2183e48766d3c4e0a5e33a1cd10226b03c159a1bae225b204ee2c5d054e3725e6811962715944d2436183447ffca93!@mailstronghold-3.zmailcloud.com> <50AD82E62C5CE3885D210AEC@[192.168.1.30]> <20170920014055.GF3174@bender.it-sys.cpp.edu> <WM!84b12a59e0d168f09b69cb5fd58520cf90f13cb650970d6a429ca3c8ebdea82e4b272b65939528f7c457b4fe667d341f!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com> <3A7C68240B951AE05CD57D57@[192.168.1.30]> <20170922035918.GM3174@bender.it-sys.cpp.edu> <WM!47feb8432c7ab0fa5225873885c9dc69dafae8206a443940db9ba8e2f751c9fab0ef585a1c1d22b738292952e66893c1!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com> <A490B24FC8DEE11A7275A5E5@[192.168.1.30]>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 08:50:38AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Oh, I thought you had said you only had two masters. This could well be
Ah, my bad, there are a total of 4 nodes, and while technically I guess
they could all be "masters", only two of them ever receive writes, one
is the primary behind a hardware load balancer and the other is the
secondary; so in my head I have two masters and two read only systems.
Which I suppose isn't really accurate from an openldap architecture
perspective, sorry.
> ITS#8444 (ignore the ITS title, it has nothing to do with memberOf), where
> there are out of sync problems with 3+ MMR nodes and delta-syncrepl when
> syncprov checkpoints.
Oh, I remember that ITS, I thought I'd fixed that issue by getting rid
of the memberOf overlay and switching to dynlist 8-/. It seems since I
stopped paying attention to it it's moved on in other directions.
I see there was a proposed patch posted on 8/25 that's been applied to
RE24, I'll add that to my system and see if the issue goes away. Am I
correct in my assumption that the patch only needs to be applied to the
system that is receiving the updates?
Thanks...