[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: RE24 testing call (2.4.45) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.20)
- To: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: RE: RE24 testing call (2.4.45) LMDB RE0.9 testing call (0.9.20)
- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:25:30 -0800
- Content-disposition: inline
- In-reply-to: <WM!f9addfbb1e971a96ee338f9a8f497c159439eb7cb44ba1cc0851063d7af1a757152fdd4b143ae62794c401f4644af864!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com>
- References: <ED38F9D4DE1C79C42B095763@[192.168.1.30]> <0c1101d27d97$934bae70$b9e30b50$@acm.org> <WM!c657bc59db6d7497a731430af975f7b16cd4ba2fe273be433ec85a0d3af509a7442c335720cc417cc628fb1e88c5b2d2!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com> <FDA4AFA35DD14E2F924C8E86@[192.168.1.30]> <109e01d27e5d$7dc81a90$79584fb0$@acm.org> <WM!f9addfbb1e971a96ee338f9a8f497c159439eb7cb44ba1cc0851063d7af1a757152fdd4b143ae62794c401f4644af864!@mailstronghold-1.zmailcloud.com>
--On Friday, February 03, 2017 12:38 PM -0800 "Paul B. Henson"
<henson@acm.org> wrote:
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 1:26 PM
quanah@ub16:~/openldap-2.4.45RC/tests$ ./run -l 500 -b mdb test061
Will run test061 500 times, using back-mdb as the backend. Instead of a
specific test, one can do "all" to run everything through a loop X times.
Ok; to clarify then, if a test fails, make will abort?
Yes.
Interesting... it may be worthwhile to look in the testrun directory and
see why slapd failed to launch. I'll see if I can reproduce it as well.
Ah, I bet it is this:
Unrecognized database type (ldap)
5894e87d
/user/henson/tmp/openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_4-ab6f04c/tests/testrun/slap
d.2 .conf: line 16: <database> failed init (ldap)
I configured it the way I run it in production; this test must be using a
module I don't enable. Sorry for the false alarm. For testing purposes,
should I just run ./configure with no options? Or a subset of the options
I would normally use on a production system?
It means I need to fix the regression test to ignore back-ldap. ;)
I've not been able to reproduce it.
Hmm, I must have misunderstood you; I thought in this message:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201612/msg00108.html
You had indicated you were able to reproduce it.
It turned out to not be related. :/
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Architect
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>