Antw: Re: Partial SyncRepl replication

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>]

>>> Frank Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu> schrieb am 24.05.2016 um 14:10 in Nachricht
<alpine.OSX.2.20.1605240743160.16039@vc0ns51415.vag.hiz.rqh>:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016 at 3:10pm, Howard Chu wrote:
> 
>> The contextCSN is used in replication, but it does not get replicated 
> itself. 
>> Each replica maintains its own.
> 
> I was testing my partial replication against my test MMR setup.  I have 
> discovered that the database suffix in the two MMR's have two contextCSN 
> values.  The code I was using to test was checking the first contextCSN 
> value returned from the "master" server - which is not the "current" CSN 
> against the value generated by the replica.  I have not (yet) figured 
> out what that first of the two values is indicating.

I think there is one CSN per ServerID, like this:
contextCSN: 20130722065709.189194Z#000000#000#000000
contextCSN: 20160222141054.581517Z#000000#001#000000
(or another context)
contextCSN: 20130719093756.074776Z#000000#000#000000
contextCSN: 20160517103616.692516Z#000000#001#000000
contextCSN: 20151007103227.123574Z#000000#002#000000

> 
> -- 
> Frank Swasey                    | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs 
> Sr Systems Administrator        | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
> University of Vermont           |    just like everyone else.
>    "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)