I tried exactly that notation however that replaced the whole entry (so only one index left). I only wanted to replace the 12th index.
On Mar 14, 2016 15:12, "Cole" <cole@opteqint.net> wrote:Hi,
Yes, it should be possible, so from your first example:
dn: olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config
changetype:modify
add: olcAccess
olcAccess: {0}full accessrule
Change that to:
dn: olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=config
changetype:modify
replace: olcAccess
olcAccess: {0}full accessrule
Notice the use of "replace" instead of "add".
Regards/ColeOn 14 March 2016 at 15:01, PenguinWhispererThe . <th3penguinwhisperer@gmail.com> wrote:I was successfully able to modify the olcLimits and olcAccess.What I still wonder if it's possible to just replace one index. I've tried but all the indexes got removed and replaced with the one I put.Thanks in advance!2016-03-11 16:27 GMT+01:00 Cole <cole@opteqint.net>:Hi,That is correct. Also if you leave out the {#} entry, the value will be added at the end of any current values.I learnt most of these details from the zytrax book on openldap, as it contained non-trivial examples. This section:http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/ch6/slapd-config.html#use-security describes the {} functionality.Regards/ColeOn 10 March 2016 at 22:56, PenguinWhispererThe . <th3penguinwhisperer@gmail.com> wrote:So from the IETF I understand I should be using something like this to insert a row at the beginning:> That's completely missing the point of these ordering prefixes.I honestly don't see a lot of mentioning about this except for replace and deletes. Maybe it was my use of keywords.I'll try again tomorrow.
I did some tries but I failed. I couldn't find any clear examples on doing what I wanted. I mostly saw add/replace options but without the {} ordering. I'm very new to this.dn: olcDatabase={2}mdb,cn=configThanks for your responses! Greatly appreciated!
changetype:modify
add: olcAccess olcAccess: {0}full accessrule2016-03-10 18:39 GMT+01:00 Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca>:On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 05:18:01PM +0100, PenguinWhispererThe . wrote:
I've been looking for examples for inserting in between but couldn't find
any. Maybe I use the wrong keywords in our favorite search engine.
Is this deleting and adding or replacing the way to go to make these
changes?
Are there alternatives?
You can add a new entry with the index {n} specified. Existing entries will be re-numbered (their index incremented) to make room.