[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: delta sync and strictrefresh
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: delta sync and strictrefresh
- From: "A. Schulze" <sca@andreasschulze.de>
- Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 08:23:00 +0100
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.somaf.de 3qKlHT3plJzDbs
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=andreasschulze.de; s=ybz; t=1457508181; bh=QDO9qWtN7lCYc5PdifqUXCnp/e1+qiEAdDKzdOwY2fI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=n3JjgUU991t/reg6pHGRM2iWOPk7ZU+BuIl/pj0sgMpjoNM5qUptoSfRie5WUqNyU ETX6rrHQoZZUeOth/pFwb+2bb9OkfmR2pA7g3YwCM5Srv9roMQFGk0E0kWUjZLrVJe cVupjNbhmBAoAvmsREc/GNWflYbcPpQnYg0bOqXOD5JunsQLAt1BDlBpwd0NFoS/7G oIuB0e+5V4Zw+k3vYuQMAeC2WbMZL0/fQdgOz5PFfupnQiur3MKP5G0CyjndoPkF31 7UlocPmHThErpqRxi4RJAHuXkPHh/iiq8CVXbRpl/EoHUSNxWiQBOfj993BT0TEfFO 6ynBNgJ2Ygc1Q==
- In-reply-to: <56DF49CF.4060409@symas.com>
- References: <20160308211316.Horde.GypvzvjbSnE4DU4U3p33UA1@andreasschulze.de> <56DF49CF.4060409@symas.com>
- User-agent: Horde Application Framework 5
Howard Chu:
strict refresh was an experiment, which is also why it remains
undocumented. What you describe is the desired effect but as you've
found, it doesn't work as intended. It looks to me that one of the
refresh scenarios isn't being caught but I haven't looked closely at
this feature in quite a while.
Howard,
thanks for response.
I understand this is not a wrong configuration but not fully
implemented feature.
Patches welcome.
no Idea about details how the sync protocol works.
But I've some other patched I'll publish for discussion.
Andreas