[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Regarding ITS 8268 slapd-ldap quarantine
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Regarding ITS 8268 slapd-ldap quarantine
- From: Nikos Voutsinas <nvoutsin@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:22:54 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=y4jjd/rdbj/J9DunTSD1tlOJYTDYPGsc01GmoUvEsNU=; b=MVdaPKBoLlbjzacOuFfo5LeQOY8n5cJEa3pfoseCRMV5Cw71abRzeY2JN7qtldlMJt faflFtdqSAsAVnlfUG+99rFz+mPLXp1vPIiJoWLccdEyo3GoP9RJY2SZ0clO48mmPuxZ dkuUlkNxY6qMCndJJyJrIQPBKZ+dBQKg3gpHbv+uVms+WYISOksCTUxaTdn29HEU8+mM HGb8Zne63U6pVwEcX3w+yn+HZL5Q0FIIXcCavjwyGYOhEXhuPyfoe0rLVNC7O006puUT Lz78N/UTyrFc1CZ8BqdZxGB2RblFpFiavSuqVpks61tWTG2b5C6IzPoVguooqM2LlWXh X11Q==
Hi,
May I ask how come and ITS 8268 never made it to software bugs? Isn't the case well described?
Anyway, while we have already worked around the problem, actually by disabling the feature, I was curious if the dev team or anyone else has tested slapd-ldap quarantine with a recent Openldap version ( we have noticed similar behavior both with 2.4.41 and 2.4.42)
http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Incoming?id=8268
Best Regards,Nikos