[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: empty ldapmodify refused with slapo-unique
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: empty ldapmodify refused with slapo-unique
- From: Geert Hendrickx <geert@hendrickx.be>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 17:23:25 +0200
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=hendrickx.be; s=geert; t=1444317805; bh=dH4bwBGpw+unMJ5a9Zmcg0i7l426knJGeTfRg+ZNlRE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=WBrEYJEb0mEdmvHeFYUf7SuQ7400vdadg21uFHI00I1U9VdKlzq6t26vBW/7VSsgH WOPE+dzeVAWpmCLJp8GYTFbj4IpshZYN/OcQej/Ju/eIvD7QTcRIT2KLYudsDYya70 jY6Ry4w4u4EgUgcBMKNQqiIqbZ+FDdy5VSo9FX4lReZTm/TQdiXJxPYAzNKuRPGWXj 71CGADfDb/Han5+B2G+sssL+hNuURIJlS6YPDAT2tQZs/g92OhF3KpxCMiD49t11OP 10/zS3KRXuGW42ocbeKnpV3lHkgcMJUZ09Gy87MGBeKBGgtRBXXw1G0z0iMkv7LlKf hh7brPqySHoiw==
- In-reply-to: <20150914151456.GA15697@vera.ghen.be>
- References: <20150914151456.GA15697@vera.ghen.be>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 17:14:56 +0200, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> When slapo-unique constraints are in effect, it seems empty updates are
> no longer allowed:
>
> > $ ldapmodify -x -h localhost -D cn=Manager,dc=my-domain,dc=com -w secret
> > dn: cn=test1,dc=my-domain,dc=com
> > changetype: modify
> >
> > modifying entry "cn=test1,dc=my-domain,dc=com"
> > ldap_modify: Invalid syntax (21)
> > additional info: unique_modify() got null op.orm_modlist
>
>
> Why is this considered invalid syntax? Without slapo-unique constraint,
> empty updates like these are accepted.
Anyone?
Geert
--
geert.hendrickx.be :: geert@hendrickx.be :: PGP: 0xC4BB9E9F
This e-mail was composed using 100% recycled spam messages!