[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages

To: Abdelhamid Meddeb <abdelhamid@meddeb.net>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 12:33:24 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.3 edge01.zimbra.com 6C77744220
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zimbra.com; s=C2AA288C-EE47-11E2-9BB0-E820BDD9BDBF; t=1443382406; bh=64vCPVd1cJRtsCOO6mgzf5vIhVJ7xIz0q/gcC3OTZ1M=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=doV5exeeyzBIWOkVwjRNk9Nqp/nxregr7FJAI1KGPFDaJyHqdXaUSIdyZm44IOKFr f82lgndcWK0hsuBiTg99ACOKn+YbTxS7AfZxhH8Ypmpg1rZCMUP0CqQjQK72FNm9gO w8cKwxtpudijXAloFntsTbtJ2T4DK0U636AmUOX4=
In-reply-to: <56078C31.6010504@meddeb.net>
References: <5606D1CC.9080805@stroeder.com> <EF056E64C6EDE68CE0929D60@[192.168.1.9]> <56078C31.6010504@meddeb.net>

--On Sunday, September 27, 2015 9:26 AM +0200 Abdelhamid Meddeb<abdelhamid@meddeb.net> wrote:

Hi,

+1
Statically link is a bad idea in this case, IMHO.

Nope, statically linked is the only supported method. Any given OpenLDAPrelease is designed specifically to work with the LMDB version it shipswith. Dynamically linking it where the LMDB version could be changedunderneath OpenLDAP is not supported.


--Quanah



--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

References:
- BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
  - From: Abdelhamid Meddeb <abdelhamid@meddeb.net>

Prev by Date: Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
Next by Date: Re: BP build OpenLDAP and lmdb packages
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread