[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: "olcSizeLimit: size.prtotal=disabled" ignored?
- To: Dieter Klünter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Subject: Re: "olcSizeLimit: size.prtotal=disabled" ignored?
- From: Igor Shmukler <igor.shmukler@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:38:42 +0300
- Cc: "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VtkDJzoiaVbngedac6XLMi2cuOhcbAuI0oNC92Ow/sg=; b=K+bwu2CDYXU69Il7DdI/VoIMR8gz/fELixaLpW8L6Dsg3xnSljZGI6460SKbcldXci gYbH4XknZQrgvqPdE/KTBhzJ/6nW2lGznjyGY2upEo6IYFBZmjP8qLDkobwzLmtN6rTB 0U0fw7ByUr4uPU9SOVAaYfSYlZ6s5jR0UYkjVU/TMv36RfcMh2nyJz+OCGjdNp4iwxb3 8hmK5nyFpKFwRqBGZfNiWm6HV2/Z5XOo/W+xRCIxHuyPQGm6SKeFr3+PJYd90yGGCkd4 Y5AmUt7uAwKu56WMcSWmlaH0ZQf69R+yHzhBn7R2RyujK/nIRJs+5Dk3Rdp+YXzBSxBg W7Ug==
- In-reply-to: <20150901134836.30766571@pink.avci.de>
- References: <CAA1SNA09WOiT8yQ7o+2L6jETjsriHJpMqmgd9tk==e9Dvq6Jig@mail.gmail.com> <20150901134836.30766571@pink.avci.de>
Hello Dieter,
Thank you for replying.
> slapd silently ignores the control request, but sizelimit still comes into effect.
Given that, as well as the other relevant information...
Is "olcSizieLimit: size.prtotal=disabled" not affecting the response,
a bug in OpenLDAP 2.4.x, or did I incorrectly understand the
documentation? If it is a bug, should it be filed?
How would one go about disabling simple paged results [having the
OpenLDAP server respond with critical extension unavailable or
similar]? Is restricting access to the control with an ACL is the way
to go?
Thank you,
Igor Shmukler