[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: group email addresses

To: brendan kearney <bpk678@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: group email addresses
From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:54:50 +0100
Cc: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <CAARxGtgT+soMB2_7DmbPBHJiKHQhn1E8ZF93=rh0bfngs2r=yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5581DA90.7010707@gmail.com> <20150618090040.GA3484@slab.skills-1st.co.uk> <55828D87.1020407@stroeder.com> <CAARxGtgT+soMB2_7DmbPBHJiKHQhn1E8ZF93=rh0bfngs2r=yw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 08:13:48AM -0400, brendan kearney wrote:

> I am using postfix. is there a benefit to the group based expansion piece you
> speak of?  Postfix is already tied to my ldap instances for user aliases, etc.

It would allow you to use the LDAP groups to define the members of the
mailing list as well as the address of the list. The Postfix LDAP README
has some ideas about how you might set this up:

http://www.postfix.org/LDAP_README.html#example_group

Andrew
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 From Andrew Findlay, Skills 1st Ltd                 |
| Consultant in large-scale systems, networks, and directory services |
|     http://www.skills-1st.co.uk/                +44 1628 782565     |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: group email addresses
  - From: Brendan Kearney <bpk678@gmail.com>

References:
- group email addresses
  - From: Brendan Kearney <bpk678@gmail.com>
- Re: group email addresses
  - From: Andrew Findlay <andrew.findlay@skills-1st.co.uk>
- Re: group email addresses
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: group email addresses
  - From: brendan kearney <bpk678@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: LDAPCon 2015 submission deadline approaching
Next by Date: Re: group email addresses
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread