[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: hiding a naming context

To: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>, "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: RE: hiding a naming context
From: Craig White <CWhite@skytouchtechnology.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 15:22:47 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=CWhite@skytouchtechnology.com;
Content-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <555AEE89.6060506@stroeder.com>
References: <BY2PR08MB1800C6E4B66E983FA209641DB3C40@BY2PR08MB1800.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <BY2PR08MB180062D9AC39BEE57D0F61E2B3C40@BY2PR08MB1800.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <555AEE89.6060506@stroeder.com>
Thread-index: AdCRvKkBpTEeFJD/SzSqr2+ooGWz+QAAo35QABLNNoAAD0jEoA==
Thread-topic: hiding a naming context

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Ströder [mailto:michael@stroeder.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:04 AM
To: Craig White; openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: hiding a naming context

Craig White wrote:
> Oh - and I put in just a single value in the ldif...
> 
> dn: olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config
> changetype: modify
> add: olcAccess
> olcAccess: {0}to dn.exact=""
>     attrs=namingContext

s/namingContext/namingContexts/

----
I see said the blind man - worked - thanks.

Now to determine if that actually hurts anything that I am doing otherwise.

Thanks

Craig

Follow-Ups:
- RE: hiding a naming context
  - From: "Ralf Mattes" <rm@mh-freiburg.de>
- Re: hiding a naming context
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- RE: hiding a naming context
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- hiding a naming context
  - From: Craig White <CWhite@skytouchtechnology.com>
- RE: hiding a naming context
  - From: Craig White <CWhite@skytouchtechnology.com>
- Re: hiding a naming context
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RE24 testing call (2.4.41)
Next by Date: RE: hiding a naming context
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread