[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Significance of name forms.
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Significance of name forms.
- From: dE <de.techno@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:44:52 +0530
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I8wKrP6sXXKEkqdZDhw1V0gib9GzUtRl2NPKaOLHPCo=; b=RGUE2UfZR0XhWLiA0u22XeaxsSHtCKY0RxiXpe2mGsJh6Qm+3xHj3OJff3Sr2m50Ma NhpZcccg43SC2o3EoiV/6VE7IHUupWdrx0cln6LbEQOrhgwFv7kbuZrbjo0DfLLYPUxg ibaiVqAdT2tCFOm1OsPHTYAuuUG408OgzCTvyjmW2d71W1ACeCcyN1k0N1tqGLcrF5X2 B9PrWoicGblMSqel8Uhr9o6gFhxqTeRyqW+wSzfoxPTvIadGE5N4q3Ljn25rjFZgMPnd RcOqB0OlNqFNyhMqYqTgfO1YP06Sv0IicHDkkVpJsD9Iixi4AbUf958I11CH0Yyx74n1 nhLw==
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
Suppose a name form is attached to a structural object class. Then, when
referring to entries belonging to that object class (which has no DIT
Structure Rules associated to it), is using the MUST attributes as
defined in the name form to construct AVA still necessary?
No DIT Structure Rules refer to this name form.