[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: catch size and performance
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
- Subject: RE: catch size and performance
- From: Greg Jetter <gjetter@gci.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:11:09 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Content-language: en-US
- In-reply-to: <5F10BB7B38507BB31C077B17@[192.168.1.9]>
- References: <5F10BB7B38507BB31C077B17@[192.168.1.9]>
- Thread-index: AQHQeUBg6Mq9PET4ToKOiD24WeWzDZ1Rkd/H
- Thread-topic: catch size and performance
Version: 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4.4
Greg
________________________________________
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [quanah@zimbra.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 10:57 AM
To: Greg Jetter; openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: catch size and performance
--On Thursday, April 16, 2015 8:59 PM +0000 Greg Jetter <gjetter@gci.com>
wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I, running a openldap setup with one provider and 3 consumers , I am
> seeing intermittent problems of replication not happening "Until" the
> consumers are re started . This cures the problem. replication starts up
> and continues for a while .
>
> The servers have very large amount of memory , 256 gigs ..
>
> I configured the hdb backend 'DB_CONFIG' , to have 4 gigs of catch ,
> could this be causing the replication problem ?
>
> whats the optional size that keeps openldap happy ?
OpenLDAP version?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration