[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Auxiliary object class practically of no use?

On 04/15/15 19:31, Howard Chu wrote:

dE wrote:

According to RFC 4512

An entry can belong to any subset of the set of auxiliary object
    classes allowed by the DIT content rule associated with the
    structural object class of the entry.

 From what I understand, this means auxiliary classes do not 'augment';
the no. of attributes which are possible in an entry must be a subset of
the structural object class the entry belongs to.


You have completely ignored "DIT content rule" in the quoted sentence.



But it says "DIT content rule associated with the
    structural object class of the entry"