On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:12:09PM +0200, julien soula wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 02:40:37PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > [.../...]
> > Did you check the databases before and after sync? Are there differences, or are you just worried about the messages?
>
> In fact, I first noticed the no-change of the slave then I took a look
> to the log and saw this message (the only suspect I saw).
to complete the subject, here is the sync log (change have been made
in branch control by rid=202) :
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: do_syncrep2: rid=201 LDAP_RES_INTERMEDIATE - NEW_COOKIE
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: do_syncrep2: rid=201 NEW_COOKIE: rid=201,csn=20150415125528.335524Z#000000#000#000000
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: slap_queue_csn: queing 0x7fcf48100be0 20150415125528.335524Z#000000#000#000000
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7fcf48100d30 20150415125528.335524Z#000000#000#000000
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: do_syncrep2: rid=202 cookie=rid=202,csn=20150415125528.335524Z#000000#000#000000
Apr 15 14:55:28 ldap-dev slapd[6636]: do_syncrep2: rid=202 CSN too old, ignoring 20150415125528.335524Z#000000#000#000000 (olcDatabase={-1}frontend,cn=config)
sincerly,
--
Julien
<< Vous n'avez rien a dire... Parlons-en! >>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature