Re: back-sql deployment woes

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Subject: Re: back-sql deployment woes

From: Nick Atzert <tlkg.me@gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 20:18:03 -0500

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=aFOqYY3s2y7L6yBVAp4VdWcD5k+SuwIAwRqdm1fZn5E=; b=x37PYpgdng/1GCdkSnPj5mrIMnpN4OPrbMlYMGWwDthUEGU6tBpJLnGpEj4hIpYb+M u1tdCBfiUzLckyk6knTmGq+fQLgAGY8R3Y1iifV2N9Y8WHCq3ygUgNt4KU2/1+ARzOok k0CvWOnJmPTwFFY7Xy7wWfrW/2QcLWABc9R9EMtLBOJaJ8xSVCmvxNggv23l2v5sip0m Dn3FxSnKXTOF9f46F9iKYsR0wqVAsGrNm1fcR0uCZcf5TSK2vYSCLfRbW+qDmBAdWhqh cVyPTCh83/PH3AB/Ul8JbLiSutftj3vf27yH+aifGrjHLhilYXrXYytVshuL6CwIM71c GExA==

In-reply-to: <459D423395D482759DEB7D6F@192.168.1.4>

References: <54AB2BE7.9050703@gmail.com> <459D423395D482759DEB7D6F@192.168.1.4>

I personally wouldn't move to a sql backend.. I've recommended against it. This is what the boss wants though so here we are. :-)

Any ideas?

Thanks.

On Jan 5, 2015 8:03 PM, "Quanah Gibson-Mount" <quanah@zimbra.com> wrote:

--On Monday, January 05, 2015 7:27 PM -0500 thelastknowngod <tlkg.me@gmail.com> wrote:

I've finished moving my existing LDAP user data into MySQL

Why would you move to SQL for an LDAP server?

for use with
back-sql on my testing machine and everything is working perfectly.

back-sql is entirely experimental and generally unsupported.

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Platform Architect
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:

Re: back-sql deployment woes
- From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Re: back-sql deployment woes
- From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

References:

back-sql deployment woes
- From: thelastknowngod <tlkg.me@gmail.com>