Chris Neilson wrote: > Is it advisable to remove unused schemas? Does including unused schemas result > in any sort of performance penalty (e.g. while booting or when doing searches)? Regarding slapd there's no noticable performance penalty. If you have schema-aware LDAP client applications there could be a small performance penalty if those do not implement decent schema caching. There are only very few schema-aware LDAP client applications which are worth using anyway. > If I want to use syncrepl to replicate my data do I have to have the exact > same list of schemas in the same order on the consumer (i.e. does the number > in the curly braces matter)? In general (for safety) and if in doubt: Yes. There might be exceptions in some rare corner cases and if you really know what you're doing. ;-] > If I add a schema to a consumer does it have to > be added to the provider as well even if the attributes it contains are unused? Most times no. Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature