[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

referrals

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: referrals
From: Balazs Kovacs <balazskov@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:53:10 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0XJQYesX+JVwlwjfRx1e8c+uuKgJ3kTPpGbJaHW5AoQ=; b=GY9nbuKr7680MAoz9NZgEhBLiikeUqF3+Utmt39JGsJk7pZZswhe8cZdnhzI6pJ0fm Yt+Qu9q2f0NCJjLjmNWw7yGS0vgZFyH6P0BPa10Hdb8UG8QhkrmJDOpUB3bCH5diy/Ls tyNpfLUJ94dVLvPYWdQZzXr+e9vzqB9PgiD6OwW3ZK/CDe4iLSQeZFHIh3h8ROPsaPhz HjRgzAetbUeNGXmc1kotXKq3XOjvJP5cGrBpBf4g43A7v2sLCn6xnvY5tOmQ9/zFYL5N JfUvmJyqMsa4CSLPDP8BPng2Y3TdOTpHvVwNAhVP3e4aiU8Pu5erP72SLh/R1eYam10Q 3jcQ==

Hi,

I'm reading about referrals in RFC4511, which says:

"Referrals can be returned in response to any operation request (except Unbind and Abandon, which do not have responses)."

Can OpenLDAP slapd return referrals for bind operations?

I got them for searches but not for binds. I'm using "Subordinate Knowledge Information" as described here" http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin24/referrals.html

If no, can you please tell me the reasoning behind it?

Best Regards,

Balazs

Prev by Date: Seems that syncprov holds up LMDB's reclaiming while handle a syncrepl requests.
Next by Date: Q: accesslog and sessions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread