[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second



On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:51:02PM -0700, Howard Chu wrote:

> You need to actually use microseconds, since the time-increment is
> only unique on the local server and will not guarantee uniqueness in a
> replication scenario.

Attached is an updated patch for this ITS which uses microseconds rather
than the time-increment, maintains the semantics of "now" being when the
code is called rather than when the operation began, and copies the
first timestamp to create a second with microseconds rather than
redundantly calling slapd_timestamp.

Let me know if there's anything else that needs to be fixed or changed.

Thanks...

>From 4db8660f6616a70a67feba1e07ee6f866014b1d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 16:47:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ITS#7161 ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better
 than 1 second

---
 servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c b/servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c
index 83aa099..f8b7335 100644
--- a/servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c
+++ b/servers/slapd/overlays/ppolicy.c
@@ -911,8 +911,11 @@ ppolicy_bind_response( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs )
 	int ngut = -1, warn = -1, age, rc;
 	Attribute *a;
 	time_t now, pwtime = (time_t)-1;
+	struct lutil_tm now_tm;
+	struct lutil_timet now_usec;
 	char nowstr[ LDAP_LUTIL_GENTIME_BUFSIZE ];
-	struct berval timestamp;
+	char nowstr_usec[ LDAP_LUTIL_GENTIME_BUFSIZE+8 ];
+	struct berval timestamp, timestamp_usec;
 	BackendInfo *bi = op->o_bd->bd_info;
 	Entry *e;
 
@@ -929,11 +932,20 @@ ppolicy_bind_response( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs )
 		return SLAP_CB_CONTINUE;
 	}
 
-	now = slap_get_time(); /* stored for later consideration */
+	ldap_pvt_gettime(&now_tm); /* stored for later consideration */
+	lutil_tm2time(&now_tm, &now_usec);
+	now = now_usec.tt_sec;
 	timestamp.bv_val = nowstr;
 	timestamp.bv_len = sizeof(nowstr);
 	slap_timestamp( &now, &timestamp );
 
+	/* Separate timestamp for pwdFailureTime with microsecond granularity */
+	strcpy(nowstr_usec, nowstr);
+	timestamp_usec.bv_val = nowstr_usec;
+	timestamp_usec.bv_len = timestamp.bv_len;
+	snprintf( timestamp_usec.bv_val + timestamp_usec.bv_len-1, sizeof(".123456Z"), ".%06dZ", now_usec.tt_usec );
+	timestamp_usec.bv_len += STRLENOF(".123456");
+
 	if ( rs->sr_err == LDAP_INVALID_CREDENTIALS ) {
 		int i = 0, fc = 0;
 
@@ -946,8 +958,8 @@ ppolicy_bind_response( Operation *op, SlapReply *rs )
 		m->sml_values = ch_calloc( sizeof(struct berval), 2 );
 		m->sml_nvalues = ch_calloc( sizeof(struct berval), 2 );
 
-		ber_dupbv( &m->sml_values[0], &timestamp );
-		ber_dupbv( &m->sml_nvalues[0], &timestamp );
+		ber_dupbv( &m->sml_values[0], &timestamp_usec );
+		ber_dupbv( &m->sml_nvalues[0], &timestamp_usec );
 		m->sml_next = mod;
 		mod = m;
 
-- 
1.8.3.2