[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: posixgroups vs groupofnames

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: posixgroups vs groupofnames
From: Doug OLeary <dkoleary@olearycomputers.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 21:25:04 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <538253B8.905@symas.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.03.1405251241290.22741@olearycomputers.com> <538253B8.905@symas.com>
User-agent: Alpine 2.03 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)

Hey;

An LDAP NSS module properly configured to use rfc2307bis doesn't need or usememberuid.
OpenLDAP nssov just uses rfc2307bis by default.

Interesting. So, it is possible to get where I'm going and member is theattribute that it should be looking for. Thank you. That gives me another

avenue to explore


Doug O'Leary
------------
Senior UNIX/Security Admin
CISSP, CISA, RHCE, CEH
O'Leary Computers Inc
dkoleary@olearycomputers.com (w) 630-904-6098 (c) 630-248-2749
linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/dkoleary
resume: http://www.olearycomputers.com/resume.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: posixgroups vs groupofnames
  - From: Doug OLeary <dkoleary@olearycomputers.com>

References:
- posixgroups vs groupofnames
  - From: Doug OLeary <dkoleary@olearycomputers.com>
- Re: posixgroups vs groupofnames
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ITS #7161, ppolicy pwdFailureTime resolution should be better than 1 second
Next by Date: Re: posixgroups vs groupofnames
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread