[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RDN
To
:
openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject
:
RDN
From
:
Artur Nike <
opalsie@gmail.com
>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 13:31:29 +0200
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NiYQ050TnTnRsxUZJk/LNgPeBbVlB080o9VeP3Z8GHY=; b=XB5V+CgwNhhgb30conCGALmw8GeHt/3o18rY07yo0y87roSkd0AoB5DFuBS1e7Of1I kY4Vs3Ci1JlNfifTprZroiG8IQ9nD5OzX/XWf8ObK3/0aZdfrtI7VIVbIuBryM02Kplu +y5EEe6R412vhoLEATsidGeT+ob6cHnRMHtGN/StcuRsKSkB3ctEKqfY97VgT3aFv9eP tUcdJmAmE35EbtMtrUNpv6bi4pREG1gv0c4/qphT/ACaCtx9ekXrRdf8n64tZ5BXaHmC cVqlQhpcne7sTL6qd6Uph/tydOkYR9qK0qi9H5Myfrmv7tJmOf3ew1egMcwbRvlXZJ3v RDwg==
Hi all,
Is the suffix Âdc=example,dc=com in tree is a valid rdn ?
Âand whether the drawing
http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/ch2/dit-dn-rdn.png
is correct?
Regards
Mariusz
Follow-Ups
:
Re: RDN
From:
Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Re: RDN
From:
Mike Jackson <mj@netauth.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: ldapsearch hidden option "-T"
Next by Date:
Re: RDN
Index(es):
Chronological
Thread