Howard Chu wrote: > Mike Jackson wrote: >> >> Quoting Dieter KlÃnter <dieter@dkluenter.de>: >>> >>> The attribute type is openLDAPaci. The model is based on >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ldapext-acl-model-08 >>> >> >> Does this FAQ-O-Matic still represent the current situation regarding >> the semantics and not recommended for general use? > > Yes. Given the power of OpenLDAP ACLs in the normal configuration I also do not see any real need for in-directory ACLs anymore. set-based ACLs could be a bit faster though (see my other posting). :-) Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature