[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
autoreconf failing with automake errors
Hi,
I am trying to build the openldap package from the source following
the release tarball from
ftp://ftp.openldap.org/pub/OpenLDAP/openldap-release/openldap-2.4.39.tgz.
I am building this package in a new architecture ppc64le ( IBM PowerPC
Little endian ). As the config.guess and libtool did not have the
required patches to identify this new architecture, I did autoreconf
-f -i in my build system whose latest automake and libtool has the
patches of ppc64le. but the autoreconf failed with the following error
automake: error: no 'Makefile.am' found for any configure output
autoreconf: automake failed with exit status: 1
As the config.guess and configure scripts were updated with the
ppc64le patches, i went ahead building the package. IT subsequently
failed during 'make' with the following errors
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/rajesh/openldap/openldap/libraries/liblber'
rm -f version.c
../../build/mkversion -v "2.X" liblber.la > version.c
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile cc -g -O2 -I../../include
-I../../include -DLBER_LIBRARY -c assert.c
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= cc: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -g: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -O2: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -I../../include: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -I../../include: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -DLBER_LIBRARY: not found
../../libtool: 1: eval: base_compile+= -c: not found
libtool: compile: you must specify a compilation command
libtool: compile: Try `libtool --help --mode=compile' for more information.
make[2]: *** [assert.lo] Error 1
FYI,
I also tried verified building the package in x86 ( Intel Box ) to get
some clues if it is specific to ppc64le architecture. Without doing a
autoreconf (which I dont require in my x86 laptop), the package
building was sucessful. When I did autoreconf in my x86 laptop, I was
struck with the similar errors as I had mentioned above.
So, can anyone provide any clues how to progress or redirect this mail
to the right person if this is not the right place to discuss this
issue?
Thanks and Regards
Rajeshkumar S
Linux Technology Center, IBM