Re: Question on replication files.

[espeake@oreillyauto.com]

From:	Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
To:	espeake@oreillyauto.com
Cc:	openldap-technical-bounces@openldap.org,
            openldap-technical@openldap.org
Date:	03/13/2014 01:16 PM
Subject:	Re: Question on replication files.
Sent by:	openldap-technical-bounces@OpenLDAP.org



--On Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM -0500 espeake@oreillyauto.com wrote:

> Version 2.4.31-1+nmu2
>
> Plain syncrepl.
>
> As I said I hope to be upgrading to the latest version in the next couple
> of months.  Right now I need to get through this problem the best I can.

Known issue with 2.4.31.  Solution is to upgrade and stop using the crap
shipped by Debian.  The LTB project now has a deb repository for their
builds, I'd advise investigating switching to using it.

--Quanah

We are working towards an upgrade with a couple of questions.  We have two
very write intensive applications that run at night touch 60,000+ records.
Is MMR the best way with a large number of rights like this?  or would a
master-slave configuration work better.

Also, is there a tool or a way to make the nodes go back and check for
records that might need to updated still?  I am going to diff the the
databases, is there a way to force the servers to check again on records
that might not be changed to compare the CSN's?

Thanks so much,
Eric


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content,
and is believed to be clean.
  Message id: C084960141C.AEC8C




This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS § 2510, solely for the use of the intended recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.