[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: set syntax possible in search filter?

To: Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>
Subject: RE: set syntax possible in search filter?
From: Pierangelo Masarati <pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014 12:17:58 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "openldap-technical@OpenLDAP.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Content-language: en-US
In-reply-to: <CANJgB1m-xL-_iS1ZRzKEqSitKhr3k9Gt2UGPWV7Y5qZLPutQMw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANJgB1=1fK+DZzquE=VRzmEi2P1uuAV8yRGRumdWHgx-NdKy3g@mail.gmail.com> <531ACE7C.4090409@polimi.it>, <CANJgB1m-xL-_iS1ZRzKEqSitKhr3k9Gt2UGPWV7Y5qZLPutQMw@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHPOn98rmqDpB9440+eOJe7e5xz25rW5ScAgAAcgICAABnn/g==
Thread-topic: set syntax possible in search filter?

Pierangelo Masarati
Associate Professor
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali
Politecnico di Milano

________________________________________
From: Stephan Fabel [sfabel@hawaii.edu]
Sent: Saturday, March 8, 2014 11:44 AM
To: Pierangelo Masarati
Cc: openldap-technical@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: set syntax possible in search filter?

On Mar 7, 2014 10:03 PM, "Pierangelo Masarati" <pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it<mailto:pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it>> wrote:
> In any case, sets are only used in the context of ACL evaluation.

Thanks! Are there any plans to add this functionality in the future?

What functionality? Please define it in compliance with LDAP specs.

P.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: set syntax possible in search filter?
  - From: Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>

References:
- set syntax possible in search filter?
  - From: Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>
- Re: set syntax possible in search filter?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it>
- Re: set syntax possible in search filter?
  - From: Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: set syntax possible in search filter?
Next by Date: Client doesn't send certificate for LDAPS
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread