Re: Re: strategy for getting groupOfNames (AD) and posixAccount (Unix) to coexist?

[Philip Colmer <philip.colmer@linaro.org>]

> So what did replace "rfc2307bis"?

As far as I can tell, nothing replaced it. The schema wasn't adopted.

> IMHO until there is a replacement, the old schema will continue to be used.

You can certainly take that approach, but if the RFC isn't adopted, is that much different from making your own schema to solve a problem?

Regards

Philip

On 24 February 2014 12:16, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:

>>> Philip Colmer <philip.colmer@linaro.org> schrieb am 24.02.2014 um 10:43 in
Nachricht

[...]

> 3. rfc2307bis has expired so there won't be much (any?) application support
> for it. One of my key criteria when designing how our LDAP system was set
> up was to use classes that applications/systems were expecting to find.

[...]

So what did replace "rfc2307bis"? IMHO until there is a replacement, the old schema will continue to be used.

Regards,
Ulrich