[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Recommended version of BDB package

To: Mark Cairney <Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Recommended version of BDB package
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:38:11 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.4 edge01.zimbra.com 8C4584425D
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zimbra.com; s=C2AA288C-EE47-11E2-9BB0-E820BDD9BDBF; t=1391794692; bh=KPzqbtzUv3UzmR5FEBWJ98J1m4E6zABp/7RVoXgNU+M=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pdC+gCR/aoOY9eCf9xq8qo6F8Or/7PFMClkHmheztrkYcgf3WzPUG8ByXkJI4jAKn 8r+48+H6iC3DYkxLtzzl48fOFCJLuHVWyhOa0wajgSW8PP+QAOkSXHeXrgVIHf9Nfb 4J9O2W2574LeZC3/6JzwsgMESd/cTETeetMVBU+g=
In-reply-to: <52F5152C.3000606@ed.ac.uk>
References: <52F5152C.3000606@ed.ac.uk>

--On Friday, February 07, 2014 5:17 PM +0000 Mark Cairney<Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk> wrote:

Hi,

Having recently experienced some issues with our Live server (2.4.38,
Scientific Linux 6.4 64-bit) I was looking into possible causes and found
the following Debian bug report which suggests that BDB 5.X is
problematic with OpenLDAP.

Well, there are lots of 5.x releases, you'd need to be more specific thanthat. I've used BDB 5.2.36 for years w/o issue.


--Quanah


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Architect - Server
Zimbra, Inc.
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recommended version of BDB package
  - From: Mark Cairney <Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk>

References:
- Recommended version of BDB package
  - From: Mark Cairney <Mark.Cairney@ed.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
Next by Date: Re: Slow to add 1 million items
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread