[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?

To: <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Subject: RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:26:44 -0800
Content-language: en-us
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=/BhFCvWISB9K9O5u7NxKjC9U6hFJcwnUDHNBhtOCu9A=; b=p0cBZCDCVUlqlurowfJLutJVU+tF6m/R2K/5Q1lbLZjxXHZX603l0fextL4keGG++t kf9rcA7Q4b2tc8zZRaXP5Jl8w/GGINd3skd4D/LsDXkpSvF2MFpb5ZmyFLKLUzB89LYr wSw/SgUNfwLkL0zHXvdDos3zpwhiHaeyEbeLGruZ85kZODlxspBL/Of5pKUq90KqtgoZ zYAe5LSKo+8wkbQXtcdHAySrxUoqDaZNyEJHFBn98j/u39sYAg6FSJcWGXBn6cv0DjKT /ozCvPTyBk6IQtsuXEYeEt4golQimLZisGOV/6Rd66NEMYr3m8V+TJbBP0uhR6RMjr2R 71ew==
In-reply-to: <A6E68C705577FC2E916E209E@[192.168.1.2]>
References: <CAPcb_GK5B=-PzNuxY8wNkh+n-FRhnv0snDAcLYxjqhun1H97Bw@mail.gmail.com> <52EA7F3D.2090905@symas.com> <DBB1B1AD-EE28-4E1E-AF18-9974DC9CC06B@bayour.com> <52EA8929.2010309@symas.com> <59281912-8B90-495E-8FAC-99330FF17CD4@bayour.com> <52EA9B80.6030309@symas.com> <973E272C-A2BC-4C0B-B943-479EB299D4A5@bayour.com> <E092458822F5A957DE3F6C2F@[192.168.1.2]> <070e01cf1eeb$ded56ab0$9c804010$@acm.org> <A6E68C705577FC2E916E209E@[192.168.1.2]>
Thread-index: AQIBehI6Zsy2IgA9h4PWn4vMBbyeRgIgku54AOI7f4gCya3NPQFaqgteAXLxKjsBZp0LWQGCnAbIAU2qZqsCBGei25nNZC+g

> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 6:03 PM
>
> Our servers do a nightly backup of cn=config via slapcat -n 0, and those
> are kept for a month.  Since this is for clients, there's no revision
> control involved, but it would be trivial for someone to check in the
> resulting LDIF file into their favorite RCS system.

Hmm, so the revision control system would transition from being the
authoritative source of what the configuration is (ie, in our current
system, if somehow the running configuration deviated from the version in
revision control, it would automatically be corrected back) to simply
becoming a record of whatever changes happen to have been made on the
running configuration?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>

References:
- RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
  - From: "Paul B. Henson" <henson@acm.org>
- RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Antw: RE: Syncrepl and mmr
Next by Date: RE: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread