[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?

To: Pieter Baele <pieter.baele@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
From: Meike Stone <meike.stone@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 11:15:19 +0100
Cc: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretec.co.uk>, "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=k2sQh45h2dumTi3r/WwESTTIB5dweUpC+r583LLcBKg=; b=oDh+zP4Vm6DHQIbGHjBZksiTPn/i7lXZbalMgthmOdXa3w6m8NCUs2nQl3LTJ24kpP 6sVGTTuvKlTgkWWi93SREn5CM01GJgxhQjijhvfdhiycwv6LQyZK0ljosF1ZIeGyISlL HNvhuVmOczbR90z8lQwp+YJBvyvQOHHoikIhH0JMhxl4pS5f+ro4csZZaoUsAsdqVEE3 2C1G0yibnRcJKOpl92S6pUJbj4MBkCjyROuByNaH9brdT67BjK7W74fEFwvwB+BNxIB8 Dnuefh8IZ0/gWvVuExMlSywp+4u1z26kEqpPHS5JhKrUXR6zlKplcchwgTMIp/E29awM GFEw==
In-reply-to: <CADDXySpdgS_j2n-fB5bEzMu-gwDhKt1PsqaG5ZMcWfj2-34j5g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPcb_GK5B=-PzNuxY8wNkh+n-FRhnv0snDAcLYxjqhun1H97Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CADDXySpdgS_j2n-fB5bEzMu-gwDhKt1PsqaG5ZMcWfj2-34j5g@mail.gmail.com>

2014-02-03 Pieter Baele <pieter.baele@gmail.com>:
> It's a sadly a bit true.
>
> I like OpenLDAP a lot.... but if you don't need the *fastest* LDAP server,
> something as OpenDJ from Forgerock
> is a lot easier to configure.
>

I tried to use aliases (as defined in rfc 4512/2.6) with OpenDJ, but
it is not implemented.
So if anyone like to switch, you should take care. I can confirm, that
the configuration seems at first a little easier with OpenDJ and ACLs
working well, but thats not the only thing to make a choice ;-)

Kindly regards

Meike

References:
- Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
  - From: Pieter Baele <pieter.baele@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Have you seen this FUD - IT pros suffer OpenLDAP configuration headaches ?
Next by Date: Re: Antw: problem with accessing secure ldap --- Low Sensitivity/Aerospace Internal Use Only
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread