Re: Re: Question about search performance

To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>

Subject: Re: Re: Question about search performance

From: Ferne Quinlan <shimmy886@gmail.com>

Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:53:33 +0800

Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, "openldap-technical@openldap.org" <openldap-technical@openldap.org>

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y7QQCv3tST6TSuJIeHwLoPVEvwxjXmmxlcSLmihnkls=; b=vRwW6GcZ4+9ZRq6f4KJTdiYhmrHMWdc9Iu3F7jB9lyQlcu4hqN5YjUM1hvHDtYi5BP Yy5E9VpWOPR+jPcuXE7J4cpoda92dTOemUGUY4eWrOuwUp2jCE7jDS7MGBzbw8Fu20q4 8v7imzzIBIsez2P8BaEPN9HLK5tWLOLWVT4TlYKYfho3jv4y1bDmLD1lIkVVPGBmY0gf 9gsv10MhILC9Dn6x1MVZMy9lrozgdwWjol+tV0nUF3qH74fFdtlZsIDbboJvRC1AQTIq vYJdZuyjP3eIq2Sq2JsASWQjX0Uc4vdFdkKZHzaTnCKMrVn/Z9Qqg3LgNeddyVroFSve p9DQ==

In-reply-to: <52B81127020000A1000139BA@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>

References: <CAGMAECp963QFLafsJdH+qEXCWQK_p5ensS2uJxGTZG8OWuhaXw@mail.gmail.com> <52B0A455.3090504@symas.com> <CAGMAECrG16Lc7viyQU7Z_uHfviBB04CcgZoqw2=H23DgSE3P_w@mail.gmail.com> <52B81127020000A1000139BA@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>

I have no virus scanner, it's virtual machine.

I mean that in the same ENV and test condition, the windows version of 2.2.30 is 10x faster than the windows version of 2.4.38.

I'm reading the source code of 2.4.38 now, and i found the thread pool related code(daemon.c tpool.c connection.c) has changed a lot between 2.2.30 and 2.4.38.

It's may be the reason, i'm not sure...

2013/12/23 Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>

>>> Ferne Quinlan <shimmy886@gmail.com> schrieb am 18.12.2013 um 15:04 in Nachricht
<CAGMAECrG16Lc7viyQU7Z_uHfviBB04CcgZoqw2=H23DgSE3P_w@mail.gmail.com>:

> Thanks for your reply.
> But my test result is:
> 1. OpenLDAP 2.4.38 on Windows is about 10x slower than it on Linux. Not 2x
> nor 3x as you say.

Before comparing cats and dogs: Do you have a virus scanner on Windows that does on-access checking? On Linux also?
Did you try to disable the virus checker during the test?

> 2. OpenLDAP 2.2.30(the previous version we used) on Windows is almost the
> same fast as Linux.
> That makes me confused. Is there something related changed from 2.2.30 to
> 2.4.38?
> Or there something wrong i do with 2.4.38 on Windows?