Re: Antw: Re: Structural object issues

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>]

>>> Philip Guenther <guenther+ldaptech@sendmail.com> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 09:25
in Nachricht <alpine.BSO.2.11.1311130018240.11726@morgaine.local>:
> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> >>> Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> schrieb am 13.11.2013 um 02:24 in
>> Nachricht <90CA8980100EF12CE4C38252@[192.168.1.93]>:
>> > --On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 6:03 PM -0600 Alex Moen <alexm@ndtel.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> > 
>> >> Any advice on this?  What would the proper way to fix it be?
>> > 
>> > Add a structural objectClass to the entry.  All objects are required to 
>> > have a basic structural objectClass.
>> 
>> Sure? slapadd needs it, but ldapadd refuses to accept a structural 
>> objectclass specification in my experience.
> 
> The original poster was trying to add this LDIF:
> 
> dn: uid=maxUid,ou=ndtcadministration,o=ndtc
> objectClass: top
> objectClass: extensibleObject
> uidNumber: 55083
> 
> 'top' is an abstract object class, while extensibleObject is an auxiliary 
> object class, so none of that entry's object classes are structural object 
> classes.

Ah! You ment the value, not the tag; I thought you were talking about the tag...

> 
> 
> Philip Guenther