I've changed everything over to using sync_use_subentry on both the
provider and consumers and I am still getting "consumer state is
newer than provider!" On 10/24/2013 12:27 PM, Philip Guenther
wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013, Robert Minsk wrote:A summary of what I posted below . I have several subordinate databases and each subordinate database acquires there data via a refreshOnly syncrepl. Instead of storing the contextCSN on the subordinate database the contextCSN gets stored on the superior database. As a result the superior databases contextCSN is the maximum of the subordinate databases. This causes all but the syncprov server with the latest contextCSN to abort the sync with "consumer state is newer than provider!" It seems a configuration option needs to be added that allows storing and reading of the contextCSN on the subordinate databases as well as the maximum contextCSN on the superior database.Sounds like you're looking for "sync_use_subentry true", to be used in the database contexts of the consumers. Philip Guenther --
Robert Minsk
Systems and Software Engineer WWW.METHODSTUDIOS.COM 730 Arizona Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90401 O:+1 310 434 6500 // F:+1 310 434 6501 This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and permanently delete the original, any copy and any printout thereof. The integrity and security of e-mail cannot be guaranteed. |