[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ACL with val.regex expression

To: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>, openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: ACL with val.regex expression
From: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:59:42 +0200
In-reply-to: <52615571.7010900@cs.brown.edu>
References: <52586116.40101@cs.brown.edu> <20131012085830.25b519dc@pink.avci.de> <525EDD3E.5000100@cs.brown.edu> <525EF537.40307@polimi.it> <52612F2D.5060904@cs.brown.edu> <526139FD.8030207@polimi.it> <52615571.7010900@cs.brown.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/24.0 SeaMonkey/2.21

Mark Dieterich wrote:
> I need for
> users who have an existing value of "/bin/fsh" to be prevented from
> deleting or modifying their entry.

Why don't you use filter=(shell=/bin/fsh) then?
Maybe I did not get you right.

Ciao, Michael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>

References:
- ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Dieter KlÃnter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <pierangelo.masarati@polimi.it>
- Re: ACL with val.regex expression
  - From: Mark Dieterich <mkd@cs.brown.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: Subject Alternative Name in TLS - does this work?
Next by Date: Re: ACL with val.regex expression
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread