[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Does MDB backend shrinks on disk files after delete operation?
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: Does MDB backend shrinks on disk files after delete operation?
- From: "Igor Zinovik" <zinovik.igor@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:06:12 +0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:to:subject:references:date:cc:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iHmKasp3sAU4YupUtaG5FNWAZ8KROBnAD+ast/I8V9M=; b=vu5O57sYfJy4EP1kCihieL+o5E3JT8n6gWHKA/qxLZaaUcg4kzBPGSQiqvnfs2Nq26 VC+VYFXvB3TXHj/jrCowGdYclBlJnaY+WzzXPXkkRpO1fiiEw7srC+Oeie++EIlDiPuX //kUf2gZwU/ZwdTS8NEh2NSd4wLLHWtoZHLWdlGeYYGna9Dp5MJhRkwCfH6LsyeEjVNN E5E65DnwNKRlokYFn4F20CU6QGaYClIck5uJQkJDlzSpuVAwuqRLA5wtQM48Tim9QTOz 4IYiOkWQMbL2qLLmHhZPbsyFNU6GFCpFwcE/Ubx1Re10velDE88euNG+F1wOFLC9dpby fGGw==
- In-reply-to: <B6E2ACBC98065D501496691B@[192.168.1.93]>
- References: <op.w42ak3dnqtkijm@iz-corei5.sampo.ru> <B6E2ACBC98065D501496691B@[192.168.1.93]>
- User-agent: Opera Mail/1.0 (Win32)
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> ÐÐÑÐÐ(Ð) Ð ÑÐÐÑÐ ÐÐÑÑÐÐ Wed, 16
Oct 2013 23:41:57 +0400:
I use mdb from openldap 2.4.33
This version of MDB is not stable and can randomly corrupt at any time.
I would highly advise you to upgrade to 2.4.36 before you lose your
database.
Well, I today I upgraded all my ldap servers up to 2.4.36, so I hope I
will start sleeping better.
But still I would like to know one thing: is MDB backend from 2.4.36
ready for production use? As developer can you say about MDB 2.4.36
following phrases:
- Yes, it is ready for production. Howard and I are clearly understanding
how code works.
- It is rock solid and safe.
- I use it on production server and sleep well (though I always have
backups of my data)
Or maybe I should rollback to HDB and all its issues (cache tuning,
recovery corrupted
data files after power loss when slapd cannot start, selecting best malloc
implementation
for HDB)?