Re: Antw: Re: another CSN too old N-WAY master

["Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>]

>>> "Michael StrÃder" <michael@stroeder.com> schrieb am 08.10.2013 um 12:40 in
Nachricht <dbc9e8c25a1bb1bac7905cb6950c87ad@srv1.stroeder.com>:
> On Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:15:56 +0200 "Ulrich Windl"
> <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote
>> Are you sure you are chasing a real problem? AFAIK, in multi-master sync, 
> the
>> server that receives a change will send that change to all other nodes,
>> which, in turn, will also send the changes received to all other nodes.
> 
> It would be pretty inefficient if a provider in a MMR setup receives its
own
> modifications.

I agree, but from the logs my version seems to do exactly that, so maybe my
config is not correct, or the software has a bug. As it still does what it
should do, I don't care about the bug for the moment...

> 
> Given the fact that I'm also seeing missing entries in a MMR setup I
suspect
> there are indeed problems with the contextCSN.
> 
> Another one ITS#7710 which likely is limited to use of slapo-memberof but 
> I'm
> not really sure about that. (The data consistency issues happened without
> slapo-memberof.)
> 
> Ciao, Michael.