[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
ou=people hidden from ldapsearch
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: ou=people hidden from ldapsearch
- From: Adam <adam@spoontech.biz>
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:03:18 +0930
- Organization: Spoon Technologies
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I'm sure this is a really stupid question, and I'm sorry for
asking it, but I'm testing a migration from Sun DSEE to OpenLDAP
2.4.35 at the moment.
I am creating a DIT similar to the following:
dn: ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=users,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=groups,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
When I perform a ldapsearch against our current Sun DSEE environment
(with the same layout) I see the following:
ldapsearch -x -h ldap.example.com -b example.com
objectclass=organizationalUnit 1 -LLL
dn: ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=users,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=groups,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
When I perform the same search against OpenLDAP, I get the following:
dn: ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=users,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=groups,ou=ftp,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=us,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=bd,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
dn: ou=id,ou=hosts,dc=example,dc=com
Notice the destinct lack of ou=people,dc=example,dc=com and
ou=groups,dc=example,dc=com.
I know they're there, because I can create objects etc in them, but
I'm at a complete loss as to why they don't show up in the ldapsearch.
I know I'm obviously doing something stupid here, and again, I
apologize, but any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSD4mtAAoJEH1iO/rgZIL9FwwH/3UxTIgxrVbe7IVf99IRB+hf
veJMZ6NaqMjlFfFsla+KLbIF/64I5rwqVCLu/y6necJrQS2EY+cmZmNRlQ02/Cso
rfd5ZQgp5q7ECZSkZCTLhrB1CIY183PiloDnG41lmpJkkP+thwj4NUdcMYYxP0bo
EOMZIefdOewhV7+DOv0Jw807HCOAYrgfsbIk8uDmBUCdBaf4/WVmnLzTGMLq7zrj
HLSJC09bPqcmlEieWVXFNVajE5ztZs8XI6WmFYvrDq1/+1bKoaYMRT2sMh8HnuEM
hisFEUsLpQWSpwP52tmSGau2sOhthLPQKRBrIQbCyAwfEfwtqc+TUDmMsaxhKy0=
=AqJ2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----