[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
Subject: Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
From: David Blank-Edelman <dnb@ccs.neu.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 12:58:20 -0400
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <BB9417390FDD914CA71C7A6E@[192.168.1.26]>
References: <78C84439-CD4D-4485-B0C4-7679A2E4543F@4lin.net> <A145FB23854A64166C3BD4FF@[192.168.1.26]> <D605178F-A199-4C11-A38C-B992795396AD@4lin.net> <7F07134C353E6BCD9D78B31D@quanah-mac.local> <20130501195948.GA3033@iniquitous.heresiarch.ca> <DCF509D57499665C67C179F5@[192.168.1.26]> <79DB3FC5-4675-4A79-AD66-C8FAC91AA011@4lin.net> <43842471D077F0BD5183924E@[192.168.1.26]> <51828BD1.1050303@truelite.it> <16FD9B58A4FC00E210E3E84C@[192.168.1.26]> <1136B586-2218-421F-8DC4-9D022FB53EF1@ccs.neu.edu> <BB9417390FDD914CA71C7A6E@[192.168.1.26]>

On May 2, 2013, at 12:53 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com> wrote:

> The distribution maintainers are quite aware of the objections to the way in which they build their software.  Their decisions have little to do with needs of the end users.

Ok, then perhaps guidelines for the rest of us? I know I try to pick up tips whenever someone says "don't do it like RH, they <blah>" but it would be really swell if these things were written down someplace in a single spot.  Can you see any downside to having this documented for the public?

   -- dNb

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

References:
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Christopher Wood <christopher_wood@pobox.com>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Denny Schierz <linuxmail@4lin.net>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Simone Piccardi <piccardi@truelite.it>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: David Blank-Edelman <dnb@ccs.neu.edu>
- Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Debian Squeeze: Slapd subtree disappears, but ldapsearch finds it | unable to allocate memory for mutex; resize mutex region
Next by Date: Re: ACL on create questions
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread