[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: rwm searchAttrDN rewrite skipping some rewrites
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- Subject: Re: rwm searchAttrDN rewrite skipping some rewrites
- From: Scott Koranda <skoranda@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 00:01:14 -0600
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=lM54/uI8+YUHdtwNx68nw1EH3zrL0LrBKz3z4Hy74G8=; b=SIUyT0p3CGYDtwurlFkz5uHohr1RNF4yQAHGC3zx1TOVnePVjuA2JF29fKw+1rZFmR FPNpp/niI6GCqTZeS8NiAWrFUfLRsDiwFxC5/5G89FpA6Ttj1aD+95zSSRqPQlYgAUhh ud31OAtyzWI+BIQMuh6zS+3z88Rl++x1zA4Z3rCDkBKFoPjfkEsPM2kp0GuAY2miJtQH JVlTa3JijN9UAKuHEFj3T4ljgnBI6MeQwOGPfzKVcp4lLw1vSYF2Gu6hb0plHbg2+9Ds KvgGtpxRus3+kHturDkgzWKmWgUBn3dkQpapsIctScWqXgVsbGzKVyFoUg/Gxe0h1TPA xnZg==
- In-reply-to: <E8EC9E01C6CFE6B10A0F8D33@[192.168.1.17]>
- References: <20121207220943.GN22459@gravity.phys.uwm.edu> <E8EC9E01C6CFE6B10A0F8D33@[192.168.1.17]>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
> --On Friday, December 07, 2012 4:09 PM -0600 Scott Koranda
> <skoranda@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I checked and the 3 DNs that survive are not different in any
> >substantial way then the 97 DNs that are effectively hidden.
> >
> >Any ideas why the 3 DNs survive the rewriting?
>
> No. But why don't you just use an ACL with a regex instead?
>
Indeed. That is a simpler and elegant solution. Thanks.
Cheers,
Scott