[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Implementing ACL, using non-local groups
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Implementing ACL, using non-local groups
- From: Tio Teath <tioteath@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:15:20 +0300
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=dRWjtq7GNJXNJWKiHlRRoITGvxam42BCtYftoNEmvFQ=; b=PQzBA08m4rWR4pEC03eqVkGAASHb702WGD6QgoF/Q2LNtj2xxJa+URP4KWedxgUzeC 2UrhBiaTKyCsg/sOUPf2kPY6ZL9t0Y2/JDnjJGGXqY1dzj6xkQlYAhtCkYsUc8K2AjYm rE4tBYIinHNlEU0CZuK0DSz3TgLa4Cf71QxeNFK/t4NyfVVwUjIF8J4aADz0k/IO68vc wYkD9mYugbMT/WW8+07vxgRCA8JsYM2xNPrXSR7MIi4ZWhyZy/Le8D2TQZLkiSy119l4 02lzanlYauzQmIhLFS+bNqBLadtuMHBUJOEhP9WQ0ZF7OrDX0AHkSQP9iS4xK2J6lE5g JuSQ==
Is it possible to implement ACL, using groups which are accessed via
ldap-proxy, i.e. non-local groups? I've managed to setup
authentication for users, which are in remote LDAP server only, but
looks like remote groups are ignored in case of using 'group.exact='
statement.