[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
2.4.32: mdb stable enough?
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: 2.4.32: mdb stable enough?
- From: Karsten Heymann <karsten.heymann@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 14:54:20 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=WQKpce3QLIx0DZqDeDyi9t67tniz1KiFyM7fVlTH5XA=; b=BPJ2/emGq9vlM7uQbyfTSD0jyil5elqDvAmnO8QAwAqh+Jnw9g0WHbcZxdpqsl1WhZ 2R9JpLmVllGYLLe867RYbZnKQNd6H1n4fv8IVSYA3Re5hxv5/2db/MqXyQOb1/LJmOAk IWaskdQCvyckcwBrEv4bBI8bZUFA2o60/rXYZypHVsmN0UNfQYCxEhIjBlIg3OM1qSWX VqHt5D2gu33pn5JaY7iALxpMt8McPD6+RL/gp+DsU0kQbjPvNgdqseTJ0G4AxDivVPUg tJhxuWdvrtIZZFf9+e4ScEBAFLAKLIiEHuSTUkRq1reZu3vrtxUsivH/D5QmVr83SOtk lXhQ==
Hi,
I know this is difficult to answer, but is the mdb backend as it comes
in 2.4.32 ready for a productive master-master setup with somewhat
less tham 1mio entries? slapd-mdb(5) states it's an early release and
that incompatible changes may occur, but on the other hand hdb changes
disk format from time to time too. So, what are the opinions?
The setup will be extensively tested, but if mdb should not be ready
yet I could skip the tests and concentrate on hdb.
Thanks,
Karsten