[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Openldap Problem

To: devzero2000 <pinto.elia@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Openldap Problem
From: Patrick Hemmer <openldap@stormcloud9.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:41:42 -0400
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
In-reply-to: <CAH5b-BXLmBJqL-4wwZ_+d5v-N5gc+qGXTaMieYEQtTvq9+e8=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50112224.6000206@flamengro.co.za> <CB495E409F8883F133060EE7@192.168.1.14> <CAH5b-BXLmBJqL-4wwZ_+d5v-N5gc+qGXTaMieYEQtTvq9+e8=A@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent:
Z-usanet-msgid: XID725qgZupS7744X21



Sent: Thu Jul 26 2012 16:26:41 GMT-0400 (EDT)
From: devzero2000 <pinto.elia@gmail.com>

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>, Chris<chris@flamengro.co.za>, openldap-technical@openldap.org

Subject: Re: Openldap Problem

Very often i see answer like this on rhel, in particular.  So why
don't tell or, better, write in some faq : the openldap version
shipped and packaged with rhel is seriously borken, please don't use
it. Should not be better ?

regards

(footnote)

i am not a redhat folk

You mean like this: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/1456.html

:-)


-Patrick

References:
- Openldap Problem
  - From: Chris <chris@flamengro.co.za>
- Re: Openldap Problem
  - From: devzero2000 <pinto.elia@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Openldap Problem
Next by Date: RE: Openldap Problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread