[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Glueing together backend databases - meta, glue or chain?
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Glueing together backend databases - meta, glue or chain?
- From: Pieter Baele <pieter.baele@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:31:36 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=njeE7GD0kBo2a4KLa4WG4H7uEg3dGbsFREXnJGAaLZA=; b=ZuDB7fo0RVhxvxbLzWX6eGkPoNKgkV9TS+dXYyCpeFpGhniULkjoQ6BvV+vDhPD+Oq rYeoOvE4GRTrJkbHD0tlUAm44B4mokwF/vExaWN5tZpvaO7GrRnXNx1X7XUUJwe2aAua ZUvhlMlmaxqQx5eXBTmpFghijIHQbNfSJc68+5pRMBDK3vL6duotekLOtTogLZzkbdoX wrZ9v6SI5FhJ3i+cyUVwdUJZed3Qz7PyW6S3EnNVHPRihmB5Tpg3+flTwmQHq9yrMamz jxrag3CToViQOjhoAuUeulzOjBOpkJw+UEwGEAE/oXMTbtYFEfEbpuWOIBYZpUk8BxC2 B7rg==
Hi,
I have several backend databases on my master servers, and need to
present a combined view to clients on slaves (Unix authentication)
I think this a common question/issue...
Scenario: 5 backend DB's, 2 of these are needed on each slave server
Each of these has an ou=Groups,ou=Nodes, ou=People etc.
--- dc=common,dc=example,dc=org
--- dc=shared,dc=example,dc=org
--- dc=companyA,dc=example,dc=org
--- dc=companyB,dc=example,dc=org
--- dc=companyC,dc=example,dc=org
So one of the slaves uses companyA, common and shared
another one uses companyB, commmon and shared
and the last one companyC, common and shared
all slaves represent this as "dc=example,dc=org"
The easiest way seems using meta backend, but I've the feeling this
has drawbacks??? You can't use cn=config, performance?
Maybe there is an approach with chain or glue?
I can change my DIT if necessary.
Sincerely, Pieter