[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: HowTo index generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
Thanks for *both* advices, that helped me a lot!
Kind regards
Meike
2012/5/4 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>:
> Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 May 2012 14:13:38 +0200, Meike Stone wrote:
>>> attributetype (1.3.6.1.4....
>>> NAME ('InsertTime')
>>> EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch
>>> ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch
>>> SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.24
>>> )
>>>
>>> Now I can use this and search, but it takes very long.
>>>
>>> So I want index it for searching:
>>>
>>> * greater (">=")
>>> * less ("<=")
>>
>> Use an eq index. This doubles as an ordering index for some non-string
>> syntaxes, including integer, generalizedTime, and (I think) CSN.
>
> I brought up this discussion before:
> http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-technical/201204/msg00116.html
>
> In case the range filter is combined with a another indexed filter the
> eq-index can even lead to slower searches.
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>