[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Minimum length for uid attribute

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: Minimum length for uid attribute
From: Brandon Hume <hume-ol@bofh.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:12:13 -0300
In-reply-to: <00f701cd16d1$40342eb0$c09c8c10$@bheltry.co.in>
References: <01df01cd160a$05cbd1a0$116374e0$@bheltry.co.in> <DC85787E3DCBB33D6AD169AC@[192.168.1.44]> <00f701cd16d1$40342eb0$c09c8c10$@bheltry.co.in>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 10/04/2012 1:20 AM, Priscilla V wrote:

Yes it returns a positive result

If you turn on "Stats" logging in your LDAP server, what does a Postfixquery look like compared to your own manual search? I'm referring tothe "BIND", "SRCH" and "SEARCH RESULT" lines.

References:
- Minimum length for uid attribute
  - From: "Priscilla V" <priscilla@bheltry.co.in>
- Re: Minimum length for uid attribute
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@zimbra.com>
- RE: Minimum length for uid attribute
  - From: "Priscilla V" <priscilla@bheltry.co.in>

Prev by Date: RE: Minimum length for uid attribute
Next by Date: Re: translucent overlay and local objects?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread