[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Chinese characters in mail search causes failed assertion in slapd
- To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: Chinese characters in mail search causes failed assertion in slapd
- From: Alfie John <alfiej@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:57:31 +1100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:subject :date; s=smtpout; bh=KXJ9/jBC0sFqc+5qoKDcT23Np9k=; b=OxWLVG/Zb04 /g9IeVb10QvEM7qDiDm6u2I4mprnoyyzpnBpxJmGNR/f8g2SEO+xPCizTtwBswsU tL3ibVHTXDL3xBkws354+Fkqi+u8GzeITxsN9mUpECZPV/7j0TeHdJp296Lq/X7n 0bFhP4QUDJbAE/jiw8Sn/pvnyDM6Hn6M=
- In-reply-to: <4F30DD78.5010206@aero.polimi.it>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012, at 09:14 AM, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> In addition, I suggest you check whether the problem persists with the
> latest release; in case, please file an ITS following instructions here
> <http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/56.html>.
Thanks for the pointer.
I was using Debian's upstream which I doubt is the latest release. I'll look tomorrow.
I don't think filing a bug is the correct thing to do since as Dieter pointed out the problem is with bogus mail applications breaking the RFC and not a bug in OpenLDAP. However with the practicality of using UTF-8 for the mail attribute value is pragmatic. Thoughts?
Alfie
--
Alfie John
alfiej@opera.com