Re: Best Practices for configuration management with cn=config?

To: Jeff B <jeffb.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best Practices for configuration management with cn=config?
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:19:16 +0100
Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1328293179; l=257; s=domk; d=stroeder.de; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=Gnl7D+orR45dU7Zbvl+aTzW/ONA=; b=IfQ2ro9oyULPMczS+5lyy3tP+OOTpeFLngqk2D+0oHSwi7l732HV1sW5JvAj+gf+2DN IvhskX686pUNX/k+iuhFCsQY1xD9ZUWhRXVgKJNsQ2cCsPY5sBsaVJVWqkiR6TTxlpv+7 +XYopzEeSMoYo2aoklvY79R5KsCelr4icQ4=
In-reply-to: <CANWKOdjUKDdEHH7PJETEu39oG=RBYh6PvakHnqTFtonnzH=4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANWKOdjUKDdEHH7PJETEu39oG=RBYh6PvakHnqTFtonnzH=4Cg@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7

Jeff B wrote:

However I'm running an overlay that pukes with a slapd.conf and had to
convert over to cn=config.

Isn't that considered a bug as long as slapd.conf is still supported in 2.4.Could you please provide more details?


Ciao, Michael.

References:
- Best Practices for configuration management with cn=config?
  - From: Jeff B <jeffb.list@gmail.com>