[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: Heavy load problems
- To: "Angel L. Mateo" <amateo@um.es>
- Subject: Re: Heavy load problems
- From: Philip Guenther <guenther+ldaptech@sendmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:43:48 -0800
- Cc: openldap-technical@openldap.org
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sendmail.com; s=tls.dkim; t=1326491032; bh=NK+yIYD7itlgv94lyZaleQCqgvmDoXf8j+OsJGCNK5k=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mff3Oc6Q2vZXE+6swRmz+pQOubmxo+Nt1zL2LdcuZ0S7kkkndoTdUTSZ1qFuH27dF ggX9FI/mD0zgATcFTNmDsgURtGOHLyPP43wOd8SwOzXmER0IIpRLVNogsAsOzf+Xwh 9Kl5zcbSRIp3vKYgPWgdvYGhLJ53AzRNTyshLR3A=
- In-reply-to: <4F0FFF9C.1060903@um.es>
- References: <4F0FFF9C.1060903@um.es>
- User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSO 1167 2008-08-23)
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
...
> The only difference between the old and the new farm is that the old
> farm was replicating information with slurpd. The new one is a multimaster
> configuration. The configuration of the replica is:
...
> This configuration is in the 4 farm nodes. We have checked indexes and
> both farms have the same.
You have the exact same indexes on your new syncrepl-based systems as you
did on your old slurpd-based systems? If so, then you probably don't have
equality indexes on entryCSN and entryUUID, which will make syncrepl's
internal searches much slower and inefficient than they can be.
Philip Guenther