[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?

To: openldap-technical@openldap.org
Subject: Re: [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?
From: Khosrow Ebrahimpour <khosrow.ebrahimpour@ec.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:22:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAFYhPDs-yZpy4vmnovJ9RBs8J-g0Ztqrn6c96-y2mz1x89NPVw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Enivronment Canada
References: <CAFYhPDs-yZpy4vmnovJ9RBs8J-g0Ztqrn6c96-y2mz1x89NPVw@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-31-generic; KDE/4.5.3; x86_64; ; )

Hi,

On Friday, October 28, 2011 10:13:53 am Frava wrote:
> 
> The entries contained in "automountMapName=auto_home" and
> "automountMapName=auto.home" will be exactly the same ones; SO
> what is the best way to implement it without duplicate them ? Using aliases
> or rwm+relay ?

As long as the autofs schema required by OS X and Linux is the same you should 
be able to point to the auto.home for both auto.master and auto_master.

The auto.master may not be so easy to unify, as in my own experience different 
platforms look for specific entries to begin their automount look ups.

--
Khosrow

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?
  - From: Frava <fravadona@gmail.com>

References:
- [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?
  - From: Frava <fravadona@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: RE: [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?
Next by Date: Re: [Autofs for Linux and OSX] back-relay ? aliases ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread